Menu Bar
RedEye's Comments
Re: Low Clearance 2''
There are much more impressive domino videos on Youtube than this -- many by this same guy. I am not sure why this is the one you choose to put here!
By: RedEye
Re: Jesus is My Friend, Ska Style
My jaw is still dropped on the floor. This is so tacky and bad it is great.
By: RedEye
Re: Master Sugoi: Origami Vagina
Why are people so ignorant about basic anatomy??
This is not an origami vagina, it is an origami vulva.
A vagina would have been a long rigged tube.
This Orgami tries to reproduce the clit, labia majora and labia minora. Together these are, more or less, the vulva, not the vagina.
This is very basic stuff, no wonder the world is such a sexually repressed.
This is not an origami vagina, it is an origami vulva.
A vagina would have been a long rigged tube.
This Orgami tries to reproduce the clit, labia majora and labia minora. Together these are, more or less, the vulva, not the vagina.
This is very basic stuff, no wonder the world is such a sexually repressed.
By: RedEye
Re: Tentacle
For once I can't give a rating, as I am torn between 5 stars and 1 star. I am completely creeped out by this short. But, that is probably the desired effect. That makes it highly effective. But I never, never want to see it again.
By: RedEye
Re: Star Trek New Voyages: Come What May
Ok, first I must say how impressed I am with all the work that went into this. Can we say that somebody has too much time on their hands?
If I were to give the plot a grade on its own, it is at best a B-. But the plot is not on its own. It is trying to be a new 60s Trek plot. As far as being an homage to the orginal Trek from the sixties, an A+ in terms of versimilitude. The script writers deserve a standing ovation.
Which takes us to the acting. Lets face it, William Shatner and Co were a pretty campy bunch of B actors in a cheesy TV show. But the actors in this production make me realize that they were indeed professional actors. I can see what these folks are trying to channel -- and I really, really aplaud the effort. That said, I hope they all have good day jobs. An A for effort, but a C+ for delivery.
If I were to give the plot a grade on its own, it is at best a B-. But the plot is not on its own. It is trying to be a new 60s Trek plot. As far as being an homage to the orginal Trek from the sixties, an A+ in terms of versimilitude. The script writers deserve a standing ovation.
Which takes us to the acting. Lets face it, William Shatner and Co were a pretty campy bunch of B actors in a cheesy TV show. But the actors in this production make me realize that they were indeed professional actors. I can see what these folks are trying to channel -- and I really, really aplaud the effort. That said, I hope they all have good day jobs. An A for effort, but a C+ for delivery.
By: RedEye
Re: Improv Everywhere: Frozen Grand Central
Nah, rather fun I say. The world deserves more random acts of humor and oddity like this
By: RedEye
Re: Overpass Tornado
so, fill us in. What should they have done? (some of us are not from tornado areas, so could use your wisdom)
By: RedEye
Re: Plunger Tosser
No, "America's Got Talent" is post Gulf and Iraq War stress disorder. American's are just cowboys and quicker on the draw (and quicker to crack)
By: RedEye
Re: Checkmate, Atheists!
Ummmm.....
I am sympathetic and certainly no Christian. But this was just bad parody an not in the least funny. There a lots of really witty atheists postings here. This is not one of them .
one out of five star rating for me
Bring back Penn and Teller.
I am sympathetic and certainly no Christian. But this was just bad parody an not in the least funny. There a lots of really witty atheists postings here. This is not one of them .
one out of five star rating for me
Bring back Penn and Teller.
By: RedEye
Re: Letterman Interrupts The Today Show, 1985
I agree, pair this clip with the Today show footage and you would get six stars from me!
By: RedEye
But the setting was post Civil War America, so even if made today, why would the "blood brothers" scene be anachronistic?