Finland

 
More Tags
 







Unmoderated Tag: Politics Rating: No Votes Hits: 271 Comments: 0 1960 Presidential Debate: Nixon vs Kennedy 1960 Presidential Debate: Nixon vs Kennedy On 26 September 1960, 70 million U.S. viewers tuned in to watch Senator John Kennedy of Massachusetts and Vice President Richard Nixon in the first-ever televised presidential debate. It was the first of four televised "Great Debates" between Kennedy and Nixon. The first debate centered on domestic issues. The high point of the second debate, on 7 October, was disagreement over U.S. involvement in two small islands off the coast of China, and on 13 October, Nixon and Kennedy continued this dispute. On 21 October, the final debate, the candidates focused on American relations with Cuba. The Great Debates marked television's grand entrance into presidential politics. They afforded the first real opportunity for voters to see their candidates in competition, and the visual contrast was dramatic. In August, Nixon had seriously injured his knee and spent two weeks in the hospital. By the time of the first debate he was still twenty pounds underweight, his pallor still poor. He arrived at the debate in an ill-fitting shirt, and refused make-up to improve his color and lighten his perpetual "5:00 o'clock shadow." Kennedy, by contrast, had spent early September campaigning in California. He was tan and confident and well-rested. "I had never seen him looking so fit," Nixon later wrote. In substance, the candidates were much more evenly matched. Indeed, those who heard the first debate on the radio pronounced Nixon the winner. But the 70 million who watched television saw a candidate still sickly and obviously discomforted by Kennedy's smooth delivery and charisma. Those television viewers focused on what they saw, not what they heard. Studies of the audience indicated that, among television viewers, Kennedy was perceived the winner of the first debate by a very large margin. The televised Great Debates had a significant impact on voters in 1960, on national elections since, and, indeed, on our concerns for democracy itself. The impact on the election of 1960 was significant, albeit subtle. Commentators broadly agree that the first debate accelerated Democratic support for Kennedy. In hindsight, however, it seems the debates were not, as once thought, the turning-point in the election. Rather than encouraging viewers to change their vote, the debates appear to have simply solidified prior allegiances. In short, many would argue that Kennedy would have won the election with or without the Great Debates. Yet voters in 1960 did vote with the Great Debates in mind. At election time, more than half of all voters reported that the Great Debates had influenced their opinion; 6% reported that their vote was the result of the debates alone. Thus, regardless of whether the debates changed the election result, voters pointed to the debates as a significant reason for electing Kennedy. The Great Debates had a significant impact beyond the election of 1960, as well. They served as precedent around the world: Soon after the debates, Germany, Sweden, Finland, Italy, and Japan established debates between contenders to national office. Moreover, the Great Debates created a precedent in American presidential politics. Federal laws requiring that all candidates receive equal air-time stymied debates for the next three elections, as did Nixon's refusal to debate in 1968 and 1972. Yet by 1976, the law and the candidates had both changed, and ever since, presidential debates, in one form or another, have been a fixture of U.S. presidential politics. Oct 4, 2012 11:53 AM





Unmoderated Tag: Politics Rating: No Votes Hits: 234 Comments: 0 Stephanie Cutter: Get the Facts on Mitt Romney, Big Oil, and the Koch Brothers Stephanie Cutter: Get the Facts on Mitt Romney, Big Oil, and the Koch Brothers Join the Truth Team: https://my.barackobama.com/cutter4vid Share this on Facebook: https://my.barackobama.com/cutter2vid Tweet this: https://my.barackobama.com/cutter3vid Stephanie Cutter, Deputy Campaign Manager, shares the facts about Big Oil's latest attack. "Hi I'm Stephanie Cutter I'm the Deputy Campaign Manager here at Obama for America and I wanted to arm you with the facts about the latest attach from Big Oil. You may have heard of the Koch brothers they're secretive oil billionaires bankrolling Republican campaigns and now they're backing Mitt Romney. Pretty simple reason for this, President Obama would take away billions of dollars in unnecessary oil tax breaks --Mitt Romney would protect them. So now they're spending six million dollars on an ad that is so blatantly false the Washington Post said that they have no shame. Let's get the facts out because it's important that you guys know the truth. President Obama has helped create hundreds of thousands of clean energy jobs. Projects in all 50 states. And the way these oil billionaires and their front group completely ignore the truth is breathtaking. Let's take some crazy examples from their attack ad. They claim the administration gave money to build electric cars in Finland. No, the Department of Energy's funding was specifically for U.S. jobs at U.S. facilities. Sure enough the company is employing 700 workers in California and their planning to build a plant in Delaware. Okay another ridiculous claim: they said we sent money to China to build traffic lights. That's wrong again. Those traffic lights were built here, in this country, and helped expand our light manufacturing industry in this country. They said we gave money to a company building solar plants in Mexico. Nope. And again, our money is going to a solar plant here in America with American workers. These guys are going to say whatever it takes to tear down the President. They will literally say anything. They oppose expanding clean energy. They oppose higher fuel efficiency standards for cars and trucks. So we're going to call their BS when we see it. And we need your help to call them on it too and to set the record straight. So share this, Tweet it, Facebook it. I keep hearing about Tumblr and whatever that is please use that too. And thank you, for all of your help." May 2, 2012 9:02 AM



 
Tags: 1972, Debate, Manchester, Idaho, Houston, Edinborough, Solomon Islands, Prague, Massachusetts, Baltimore, Czech Republic, Gaza Strip, 1986, Estonia, Madagascar, Slovakia, Jerusalem, Cairo, 1968, Cleveland, Tibet, 1960, Rome, Peru, Barcelona, Zurich, 2011, Ohio, Trinidad, Helsinki, Maui, Dresden, Boise, Hong Kong, Colombia, 2012, Puerto Rico, Guam, Hungary, Taiwan, Norway, Colorado, Oakland, Koch Brothers, Mongolia, Milan, Italy, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Louisiana, Texas, Budapest, Michigan, Austria, France, Maryland, Lebanon, Bali, Spain, Trick Shots, Port-au-Prince, Greece, Namibia, Maldives, Serbia, Germany, Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Where the Hell is Matt, World Bank, Detroit, Athens, 1976, Philippines, Denver, Sweden, Thailand, Hawaii, Melbourne, North Korea, Toronto, Beijing, Bangladesh, Rwanda, Egypt, Tunisia, Angry Birds, Costa Rica, Rob Paulsen, Yakko's World, Tax, Aurora Borealis, Zimbabwe, Venezuela, Animaniacs, Syria, Associated Press, United Nations, Switzerland, John F Kennedy, Denmark, Saudi Arabia, Richard Nixon, Mitt Romney, Finland, Demetri Martin, Iceland, New Orleans, Haiti, Palestine, South Africa, Ireland, Seattle, New Zealand, Russia, Pakistan, Association Football, Netherlands, Crude Oil, Mexico, Presidential Debate, India, Afghanistan, Conan O'Brien, PSA, Canada, China, Human Children, Australia, Hillary Clinton, Israel, England, Iran, Cats and Kittens, Xmas, Dance, California, Stop Motion, Iraq, Japan, Short Films, Barack Obama, Animals, Stand Up Comedy, Music Videos, News, Celebrities, Politics, Humor, Television, Video Clips

The comments are property of their posters.

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owners.

Everything else © 2012 MilkandCookies.com.

[ DMCA | Privacy Policy ]