Presented by bunnies.
Jun 3, 2005 4:44 AM
Re: Pulp Fiction Bunnies
I think the series is running out of movies which are familiar enough to recognise and cliched enough to do in 30 seconds. I'm sure they still have a few hits left in them.
By: SpawnOfThrawn
Re: Pulp Fiction Bunnies
never said I was giving up on the series...I just did not like this one.
Re: Pulp Fiction Bunnies
Agreed. I personally would like to see 2001 summed up. It probably would make no sence, but the movie has trouble making sence over 2 and a half hours, so, what's there to mess up? Also, most people are familliar with the most important parts, such as the apes and the monolith, and "Open the pod bay door, Hal."
By: tvthefleshtone
Re: Pulp Fiction in 30 Seconds
this one was ok, but not as good as the others. problem is, this movie isn't...what's the word...linear? the story goes in and out. the chonological end of the movie is like 15 minutes before the actual end.
If you watched the movie before, you'll get what's going on here. but unlike the rest of these animations, you wont know what the hell just happened if you JUST see this.
might as well try summing up 'lock, stock, and two smoking barrels' while he's at it.
If you watched the movie before, you'll get what's going on here. but unlike the rest of these animations, you wont know what the hell just happened if you JUST see this.
might as well try summing up 'lock, stock, and two smoking barrels' while he's at it.
By: Everfalling
Re: Pulp Fiction in 30 Seconds
IT IS AS FAITHFUL TO PULP FICTION AS IT CAN BE, BUT YOU CAN'T REALLY FIT MUCH SODOMY INTO 30 SECONDS.
By: McMoneyclips
