have you ever made out with a vegan as a omnivore? I wish I tasted as good to them.

...my cat's breath smells like cat food.

You seem to have it all figured out-- I can't help but notice that YOU seem to have the political ax to grind. Dose one have to post a link in order to express an opinion??. This thing you wrote here smacks of supreme arrogance.

1) ha ha - intelligent people have different opinions than yours & there's nothing you can do about it.

2) you refer to them as "trolls"

3) you lost your own argument

Go find a political forum to beat your head against the wall

That is a very good point.

and they also object to termanaly-ill mercy killings.

As Penn and Teller once said on "Bullshit!" pro-life and pro-choice are really stupid PC terms, you are either pro-abortion or anti-abortion. Everyone is pro-life in some instances, no sane person would find it OK to take a flamethrower to a crowd of strangers. By the same rate, everyone is pro-choice in some instances, I don't think anyone would appose your right to chose which shirt you are going to wear today. In order for someone to be anti-abortion and for the death penalty, they might argue that a fetus is alive. And it is not acceptable to kill a fetus because they have never done anything wrong, while a murder has done one of the worst things possible. Personally I find abortion to be wrong, but I can see instances in which it might be necessary. However, if a girl chooses to have a lot of unprotected sex and have multiple abortions, this in my mind is wrong unlike a girl who, let's say, was raped or had some sort of health problem. I mean there's the pill, depro shot, and condoms (while not quite as fun, much more fun than parenthood).

Regarding the question in the video, it reminds me of the old saying "Ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer?" You know, when the primary and general elections come up, I don't think tribal sovereignty will be high up on my list of issues that matter.

Now for the Iraq issue. Actually according to most reports, the number of US soldiers who have died in Iraq is around 3,300 or so, not 900. Now each of these deaths is a tragedy and a great sacrifice on their part and the part of their families so if any of you have lost a loved one you have my sympathies. Also, WMDs have been found in Iraq. Don't believe me, read this pdf:

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Iraq_WMD_Declassified.pdf

I know it's from foxnews.com, however the pdf is a copy of the declassified portion of a report to the US House of Represenatives from June 2006 that details the chemical weapons recovered in Iraq that have been there since the time of Desert Storm. But back to blaming Bush for the 900 or 3000 or however many dead American soldiers we have lost in the Iraq War. Someone, I forget who, said Bush was "directly responsible" for those deaths. I didn't know he had the know how to construct and plant a roadside bomb, but I guess I was mistaken. I guess Woodrow Wilson is directly responsible for the over 100,000 dead Americans from World War I, a war started by the assassination of a prince in the Balkans which posed absolutely no threat to the US. By the way, Wilson, a democrat, was elected to the presidency on the platform of US isolationism and promised to keep America out of World War I.

One more thing about the 3,300 dead soldiers in Iraq. What I'm about to say may seem a little calloused and if so I'm sorry, but we seem to like quoting statistics so here we go. We have been fighting in Iraq since 2003 and recently some people on the news have mentioned that we have been in Iraq almost as long as we fought WWII or the Civil War. At any rate, it has taken almost 4 years for us to loose those 3,300 brave men and women. In the American Civil War, the Battle of Cold Harbor in May and June of 1864 to be exact, 7000 men died in the first 20 minutes of fighting. That's twice as many as the entirety of the Iraq War, if you're keeping track.